“Because erosion occurs piecemeal, it necessarily involves many incremental changes to legal regimes and institutions. If they are not, the mere appearance of this kind of antidemocratic conduct with no meaningful way to check it might itself undermine many people’s faith in elections and in the democratic process more generally, possibly making them less likely to participate and less likely to acknowledge the winners as legitimate.Many, possibly most, of these entrenchment efforts are currently legal or constitutional.226 Many, like gerrymandering and voter suppression, have a long history, although they are intimately connected to our history of racist exclusion from the franchise.227 But the insights of comparative law, history, and political- science scholars warn us not to look at these practices-and others not cataloged here-in isolation or out of their larger political context, or to rely on formal legality, when evaluating threats to democracy.

62:183 Likewise, if allegations of biased election administration are true, such manipulation is an example of attempts to undermine free and fair elections. See, e.g Parson & McLaughlin, supra note 121, at 100–03 Leonard Pitts, Jr.,Republicans Cheated to Win, and We All Lost, MIAMI HERALD (Nov. ROLL CALL Hewitt Sooy Romanik McQuade Orndorf

Objectives The Parties conclude this Agreement, among others, for purposes of: Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesĮarnings per share Basic earnings per share are calculated by dividing the net profit or loss for the period attributable to equity shareholders by the weighted average number of equity shares outstanding during the period.For the purpose of calculating diluted earnings per share, the net profit or loss for the period attributable to equity shareholders and the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period are adjusted for the effects of all dilutive potential equity shares.

Ltpp contest winners